Comparison of patient-collected and lab technician-collected nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for detection of COVID-19 by RT-PCR

Authors

  • Abbas Shakoori Medical Genetic Ward, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Alireza Abdollahi Department of Pathology, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Arezoo Eftekhar-javadi Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Dorsa Ghasemi Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Esmaeil Mohammadnejad Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Hoda Khoshnevis Supervisor of Genetic Ward, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Maryam Safari Aboksari Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Masoomeh Safaei Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Arabzadeh Laboratory Senior Technical Associate of Genetic Ward, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Seyed Ali Dehghan Manshadi Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Shaban Alizadeh Hematology Department, Allied medical school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Vahid Mehrtash Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:

Background & Objective:  A simple approach to prevent close contact in healthcare settings during the COVID-19 outbreak is to train patients to collect their own nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and deliver them to medical laboratories to have them processed. The aim of our study was to compare lab technician- with patient- collected oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples for detection of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) using rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). Methods:  Fifty adult patients with flu-like symptoms and radiologic findings compatible with atypical pneumonia who were admitted to the infectious diseases ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran, with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 from February 28 to April 27 of 2020 were randomly selected and entered in our study. Two sets of naso- and oropharyngeal swabs were collected, one set by a lab technician and the other by the patients, and the COVID-19 rRT-PCR test was performed. Results:  Of 50 selected cases, in seven patients all collected naso- and oropharyngeal swabs tested positive, and in 22 patients all samples tested negative for COVID-19 in rRT-PCR. Discrepancies between rRT-PCR results of lab technician- and patient-collected swabs were observed in 12 nasopharyngeal and 13 oropharyngeal specimens. Positive lab technician-collected and negative patient-collected samples were observed in 10 and 5 nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively. Negative lab technician-collected and positive patient-collected samples were observed in two and seven nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively. The overall percentage of agreement among both nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs taken by a lab technician and patients was 76% with a kappa value of 0.49 (p =0.001). Conclusion:  Based on our findings, lab technician-collected naso- and oropharyngeal swabs cannot be replaced by patient-collected ones with regard to COVID-19 rRT-PCR.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Rapid Detection of COVID-19 by RT-LAMP PCR Technique and its Comparison with Real-Time RT-PCR Method

Rapid antigen and antibody, serological tests, and RT ‑ PCR-based molecular methods are widely used for the detection of microorganisms worldwide. Objectives: This study aimed by Isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques to detect the covid-19. Methods: In this study, 200 samples of nasopharynx and oropharynx were collected from Jamaran Heart Hospital in Tehran. Covid -19 was exami...

full text

investigation of single-user and multi-user detection methods in mc-cdma systems and comparison of their performances

در این پایان نامه به بررسی روش های آشکارسازی در سیستم های mc-cdma می پردازیم. با توجه به ماهیت آشکارسازی در این سیستم ها، تکنیک های آشکارسازی را می توان به دو دسته ی اصلی تقسیم نمود: آشکارسازی سیگنال ارسالی یک کاربر مطلوب بدون در نظر گرفتن اطلاعاتی در مورد سایر کاربران تداخل کننده که از آن ها به عنوان آشکارساز های تک کاربره یاد می شود و همچنین آشکارسازی سیگنال ارسالی همه ی کاربران فعال موجود در...

Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing.

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of self-collected and health care worker (HCW)-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza viruses and determine the patients' preference for type of collection. PATIENTS AND METHODS We enrolled adult patients presenting with influenzalike illness to the Emergency Department at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from January 28, 2011, through April ...

full text

Comparison between RT-PCR, NASBA and RT-LAMP Methods for Detection of Coxsackievirus B3

Viral myocarditis is a moderate disease, but it sometimes causes progressive cardiac disorder. Many different viruses have been considered as the agent of viral myocarditis, but Coxsackievirus of the B group, in particular of the Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), is more than fifty percent of cases of viral myocarditis. CVB3 is a positive single-stranded RNA virus and a member of the genus Enterovirus ...

full text

Comparison of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for the Diagnosis of Eight Respiratory Viruses by Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays

BACKGROUND Many acute respiratory illness surveillance systems collect and test nasopharyngeal (NP) and/or oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens, yet there are few studies assessing the relative measures of performance for NP versus OP specimens. METHODS We collected paired NP and OP swabs separately from pediatric and adult patients with influenza-like illness or severe acute respiratory illness...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 15  issue 4

pages  313- 319

publication date 2020-10-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023